A “green” extract claim holds only for a stated functional unit and boundary, and a legal, reliable supply
Life-cycle method, published assessments of extraction routes, solvent rankings, aquatic toxicity tests, wild-harvest pressure and U.S. import data, each from a cited primary source.
Status. EUTECNIQ has no facility, suppliers or data and has run no life-cycle assessment. The studies shown are published work by others.
A life-cycle assessment compares two routes only per the same functional unit and inside the same system boundary
Change the functional unit or the boundary and the ranking of two routes can change, so the study's goal and scope come first.
Explanation, details and sources
ISO 14040 sets the principles and framework; ISO 14044 sets requirements and guidelines for the same four phases, plus reporting, critical review and limitations. ISO 14040 does not specify methodologies for the individual phases. The functional unit fixes what is compared, for example one gram of extracted bioactive compounds or one kilogram of dry extract at a stated marker content. A cradle-to-gate study stops at the factory gate; a cradle-to-grave study adds use and end of life.
An extract made by a route that uses less energy per batch can still have a larger footprint per functional unit if its yield or selectivity is lower. That is why routes are compared per unit of delivered function, not per batch or per kilogram of plant.
In published LCAs, the extraction route described as green is sometimes the one with the larger carbon footprint
Data table
| Route | kg CO₂-eq per g of bioactive compounds |
|---|---|
| Supercritical CO₂ extraction | 71.42 |
| Subcritical water extraction | 6.20 |
| Ratio (computed) | 11.5 |
Data table
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| LCA studies reviewed | 70 |
| Benchmarks: lower impact for the supercritical process | 27 studies |
| Benchmarks: higher impact for the supercritical process | 18 studies |
| Extraction, global warming | 0.2 to 153 kg CO₂-eq per kg of input |
| Gasification, global warming | −0.2 to 5 kg CO₂-eq per kg of input |
Energy is the usual hotspot, so the electricity mix, feed concentration and solvent recycling decide which route wins.
Explanation, details and sources
The apple-pomace study's authors conclude that "a technology labeled as 'green' is not necessarily environmentally superior." The review's ranges are per kilogram of input, which is a different basis from the apple-pomace study's per-gram-of-product unit, so the two figures are not placed on one axis.
Results from one feed, one scale and one electricity grid do not transfer to another botanical. A credible comparison would repeat the assessment with the actual process data.
The CHEM21 guide scores 53 solvents for safety, health and environment: water, ethanol and ethyl acetate are recommended, hexane and dichloromethane hazardous
Data table: all 53 CHEM21 solvents
| Solvent | Family | BP | FP | Safety | Health | Env. | Default ranking | After discussion | ICH Q3C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | Halogenated | 84 | 13 | 4 | 10 | 3 | Hazardous | Highly hazardous | Class 1 |
| 1,2-Dimethoxyethane | Ethers | 85 | -6 | 7 | 10 | 3 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| 1,3-Dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone | Aprotic polar | 246 | 121 | 1 | 6 | 7 | Problematic | Problematic | – |
| 2-Methoxyethanol | Miscellaneous | 125 | 42 | 3 | 9 | 3 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran | Ethers | 80 | -11 | 6 | 5 | 3 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 3 |
| Acetic acid | Acids | 118 | 39 | 3 | 7 | 3 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 3 |
| Acetic anhydride | Acids | 139 | 49 | 3 | 7 | 3 | Problematic | Problematic | – |
| Acetone | Ketones | 56 | -18 | 5 | 3 | 5 | Problematic | Recommended | Class 3 |
| Acetonitrile | Aprotic polar | 82 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | Recommended | Problematic | Class 2 |
| Anisole | Ethers | 154 | 52 | 4 | 1 | 5 | Problematic | Recommended | Class 3 |
| Benzene | Hydrocarbons | 80 | -11 | 6 | 10 | 3 | Hazardous | Highly hazardous | Class 1 |
| Benzyl alcohol | Alcohols | 206 | 101 | 1 | 2 | 7 | Problematic | Problematic | – |
| Carbon disulfide | Miscellaneous | 46 | -30 | 9 | 7 | 7 | Hazardous | Highly hazardous | – |
| Carbon tetrachloride | Halogenated | 77 | – | 2 | 7 | 10 | Hazardous | Highly hazardous | Class 1 |
| Chlorobenzene | Halogenated | 132 | 29 | 3 | 2 | 7 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 2 |
| Chloroform | Halogenated | 61 | – | 2 | 7 | 5 | Problematic | Highly hazardous | Class 2 |
| Cyclohexane | Hydrocarbons | 81 | -17 | 6 | 3 | 7 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 2 |
| Cyclohexanone | Ketones | 156 | 43 | 3 | 2 | 5 | Recommended | Problematic | – |
| Dichloromethane | Halogenated | 40 | – | 1 | 7 | 7 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| Diethyl ether | Ethers | 34 | -45 | 10 | 3 | 7 | Hazardous | Highly hazardous | Class 3 |
| Diisopropyl ether | Ethers | 69 | -28 | 9 | 3 | 5 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Table 4 |
| Dimethyl sulfoxide | Aprotic polar | 189 | 95 | 1 | 1 | 5 | Recommended | Problematic | Class 3 |
| Dioxane | Ethers | 101 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 3 | Problematic | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| Ethanol | Alcohols | 78 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 3 |
| Ethyl acetate | Esters | 77 | -4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 3 |
| Ethylene glycol | Alcohols | 198 | 116 | 1 | 2 | 5 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 2 |
| Formic acid | Acids | 101 | 49 | 3 | 7 | 3 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 3 |
| Heptane | Hydrocarbons | 98 | -4 | 6 | 2 | 7 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 3 |
| Hexamethylphosphoramide | Aprotic polar | >200 | 144 | 1 | 9 | 7 | Hazardous | Highly hazardous | – |
| Hexane | Hydrocarbons | 69 | -22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| Isopropyl acetate | Esters | 89 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 3 |
| Isopropyl alcohol | Alcohols | 82 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 3 |
| Methanol | Alcohols | 65 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 5 | Problematic | Recommended | Class 2 |
| Methyl acetate | Esters | 57 | -10 | 5 | 3 | 5 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 3 |
| Methyl cyclohexane | Hydrocarbons | 101 | -4 | 6 | 2 | 7 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 2 |
| Methyl ethyl ketone | Ketones | 80 | -6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 3 |
| Methyl isobutyl ketone | Ketones | 117 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 2 |
| Methyl tert-butyl ether | Ethers | 55 | -28 | 8 | 3 | 5 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 3 |
| N,N-Dimethylacetamide | Aprotic polar | 166 | 70 | 1 | 9 | 5 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| N,N-Dimethylformamide | Aprotic polar | 153 | 58 | 3 | 9 | 5 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| n-Butanol | Alcohols | 118 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 3 |
| n-Butyl acetate | Esters | 126 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 3 |
| N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinone | Aprotic polar | 202 | 96 | 1 | 9 | 7 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| Nitromethane | Aprotic polar | 101 | 35 | 10 | 2 | 3 | Hazardous | Highly hazardous | Class 2 |
| Pentane | Hydrocarbons | 36 | -40 | 8 | 3 | 7 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 3 |
| Pyridine | Amines | 115 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Recommended | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| Sulfolane | Aprotic polar | 287 | 177 | 1 | 9 | 7 | Hazardous | Hazardous | Class 2 |
| t-Butanol | Alcohols | 82 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 3 | Recommended | Recommended | Class 2 |
| Tetrahydrofuran | Ethers | 66 | -14 | 6 | 7 | 5 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 2 |
| Toluene | Hydrocarbons | 111 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 2 |
| Triethylamine | Amines | 89 | -6 | 6 | 7 | 3 | Problematic | Hazardous | Class 3 |
| Water | Water | 100 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | Recommended | Recommended | – |
| Xylenes | Hydrocarbons | 140 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 5 | Problematic | Problematic | Class 2 |
Of the 28 extraction solvents, 12 score 7 or more somewhere; 8, including water and ethanol, score 4 or less on all three.
Explanation, details and sources
CHEM21 scores safety from flash point and other physical hazards, health from GHS H3xx statements and boiling point, and environment from H4xx statements, boiling point and other criteria. The overall ranking follows the most stringent criterion, not a sum, and the authors adjusted some rankings after discussion: methanol and acetone moved from problematic to recommended. Heeley et al. note that the guide was designed for the pharmaceutical sector and that its scores may need modification for other applications, for example where distillation favors a higher boiling point.
ICH Q3C is a guideline for residual solvents in medicines. It is not binding on dietary supplements, but it is a common reference when an extract specification sets residual-solvent limits. Class 3 solvents such as ethanol, acetone and ethyl acetate have low toxic potential (50 mg per day or less acceptable without justification); Class 2 solvents such as hexane (2.9 mg per day) and methanol (30 mg per day) have permitted daily exposures.
Aquatic toxicity is tested on algae, daphnids and fish, and the lowest result normally sets the hazard category
Data table: GHS short-term (acute) aquatic categories
| Category | 96 h LC₅₀ fish, 48 h EC₅₀ crustacea or 72/96 h ErC₅₀ algae |
|---|---|
| Acute 1 | ≤ 1 mg/L (may be subdivided at ≤ 0.1 mg/L) |
| Acute 2 | > 1 but ≤ 10 mg/L |
| Acute 3 | > 10 but ≤ 100 mg/L |
In the United States these data are required for pesticide registration; for solvents and extracts they feed GHS classification, and Section 12 of a U.S. safety data sheet is optional.
Explanation, details and sources
Under OSHA's hazard communication standard, Sections 12 to 15 of a safety data sheet, including Section 12 (ecological information), "may be included in the SDS, but are not mandatory" (29 CFR 1910.1200, Appendix D). Pesticide registrants must supply aquatic data under 40 CFR Part 158: freshwater fish toxicity (OCSPP 850.1075) and acute toxicity to freshwater invertebrates (850.1010) are required for terrestrial and aquatic uses in § 158.630, and aquatic plant growth (850.4400/850.5400) in § 158.660.
The CHEM21 environment score uses GHS H4xx statements: hexane carries H411 ("toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects") and heptane and cyclohexane H410 ("very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects"). These come from classification data, not new tests.
Most medicinal and aromatic plant trade is wild-collected, and few of the species have been assessed for extinction risk
Data table
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Species with well-documented medicinal or aromatic use | ~30,000 |
| In international trade as medicinal or aromatic plants | ~3,000 |
| Share of trade volume that is wild-collected | 60% to 90% |
| Share of species assessed against extinction-threat criteria | 7% |
| Assessed species threatened with extinction in the wild | 1 in 5 |
| Global HS 1211 trade value, 2015 | over US$3 billion (threefold growth, 1999–2015) |
For a CITES-listed plant, legality is documented shipment by shipment; whether an extract is covered depends on the listing's annotation.
Explanation, details and sources
American ginseng has been in CITES Appendix II since 1975. Nineteen States and one Tribe (the Menominee Indian Tribe Reservation of Wisconsin) have approved export programs; some States require plants to be 10 years old, and most require three compound leaves. Goldenseal was added to Appendix II at the tenth Conference of the Parties, effective September 18, 1997; the 1999 notice describes the listing as covering live plants and whole and sliced roots and root parts, and excluding manufactured parts or derivatives such as powders, pills, extracts, tonics and teas. Annotations can change, so a proposed EUTECNIQ sourcing procedure would check the current CITES Appendices for each shipment.
TRAFFIC's figures are a 2018 synthesis. The IUCN Red List is updated continuously, so the share of species assessed has likely changed; the 7% figure is shown as published.
U.S. botanical imports depend on few origins, and their unit values swing by double digits in some years
Data table: top 20 origins, HS 1211, 2024
| Origin | UN M49 region | US$ million | Net weight, t | Share of value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| India | Asia | 172.46 | 24,878 | 31.1% |
| Mexico | Americas | 61.30 | 20,799 | 11.0% |
| China | Asia | 30.92 | 3,904 | 5.6% |
| Germany | Europe | 29.15 | 2,608 | 5.3% |
| Colombia | Americas | 24.49 | 4,772 | 4.4% |
| Egypt | Africa | 24.07 | 6,669 | 4.3% |
| Nigeria | Africa | 20.74 | 7,867 | 3.7% |
| Albania | Europe | 18.21 | 3,607 | 3.3% |
| Canada | Americas | 14.80 | 574 | 2.7% |
| Fiji | Oceania | 13.39 | 325 | 2.4% |
| China, Hong Kong SAR | Asia | 11.25 | 918 | 2.0% |
| Vanuatu | Oceania | 11.20 | 214 | 2.0% |
| Türkiye | Asia | 10.71 | 2,105 | 1.9% |
| Australia | Oceania | 10.35 | 526 | 1.9% |
| Sri Lanka | Asia | 9.49 | 366 | 1.7% |
| France | Europe | 7.69 | 464 | 1.4% |
| Indonesia | Asia | 5.94 | 3,534 | 1.1% |
| Morocco | Africa | 5.76 | 1,896 | 1.0% |
| Bulgaria | Europe | 5.41 | 491 | 1.0% |
| Spain | Europe | 5.25 | 421 | 0.9% |
| Other 85 countries | – | 62.59 | 5,906 | 11.3% |
| Total (105 countries) | – | 555.16 | 92,844 | 100% |
Data table: value, net weight and unit value by year
| Year | HS 1211 | HS 0910.30 turmeric | HS 1211.20 ginseng roots |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 393.6 / 64,574.9 / 6.10 | 23.6 / 6,336.6 / 3.73 | 38.7 / 483.8 / 79.92 |
| 2016 | 413.4 / 66,691.9 / 6.20 | 30.9 / 7,991.9 / 3.86 | 50.8 / 541.9 / 93.80 |
| 2017 | 409.8 / 71,729.6 / 5.71 | 35.1 / 9,371.9 / 3.74 | 38.6 / 483.1 / 79.85 |
| 2018 | 453.0 / 85,419.0 / 5.30 | 38.0 / 9,652.8 / 3.93 | 37.9 / 482.9 / 78.54 |
| 2019 | 403.1 / 85,042.7 / 4.74 | 33.9 / 9,881.0 / 3.43 | 14.7 / 272.5 / 54.00 |
| 2020 | 433.6 / 91,462.8 / 4.74 | 47.6 / 12,917.3 / 3.69 | 6.3 / 112.5 / 55.93 |
| 2021 | 490.0 / 98,892.7 / 4.96 | 62.7 / 13,194.9 / 4.75 | 5.4 / 100.3 / 53.44 |
| 2022 | 544.8 / 93,417.1 / 5.83 | 49.8 / 10,755.6 / 4.63 | 8.7 / 147.0 / 59.39 |
| 2023 | 510.9 / 83,295.2 / 6.13 | 50.8 / 11,976.3 / 4.24 | 12.8 / 209.6 / 60.86 |
| 2024 | 555.2 / 92,844.4 / 5.98 | 56.2 / 13,666.1 / 4.11 | 18.0 / 222.7 / 80.84 |
Data table: turmeric (HS 0910.30) origins, 2024
| Origin | US$ million | Net weight, t | Share of value |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 37.56 | 8,846 | 66.8% |
| Fiji | 12.63 | 3,546 | 22.5% |
| Thailand | 0.81 | 145 | 1.4% |
| Indonesia | 0.72 | 255 | 1.3% |
| Jamaica | 0.66 | 221 | 1.2% |
| China | 0.61 | 75 | 1.1% |
| Japan | 0.30 | 41 | 0.5% |
| Spain | 0.30 | 78 | 0.5% |
| Viet Nam | 0.24 | 92 | 0.4% |
| Italy | 0.23 | 2 | 0.4% |
| Other 33 countries | 2.13 | 367 | 3.8% |
| Total (43 countries); HHI 4,982 | 56.18 | 13,666 | 100% |
India supplied 31.1% of the value and the top five origins 57.3%; 105 countries shipped HS 1211 material to the United States in 2024.
Explanation, details and sources
A unit value is customs value divided by net weight. It is a price proxy, not a price: it moves when the product mix inside a code changes as well as when prices change. HS 1211 covers whole, cut or powdered plants used mainly in pharmacy, perfumery or as pesticides; turmeric is in heading 09.10 and plant extracts in 13.02, so no single code measures the botanical ingredient market. Comtrade records U.S. imports at CIF value, which runs about 5% above the customs (FOB/FAS-type) value for HS 1211.
Ginseng-root unit values moved from US$93.80 to US$53.44 per kg between 2016 and 2021, then back to US$80.84 in 2024. Over 2015–2024 the coefficient of variation of the annual unit value was 9.9% for HS 1211, 10.0% for turmeric and 19.7% for ginseng roots (computed). The largest one-year moves were −31.2% (ginseng, 2018 to 2019), +32.8% (ginseng, 2023 to 2024) and +29.0% (turmeric, 2020 to 2021).
A proposed EUTECNIQ supply plan would qualify at least two origins for each critical botanical where trade data show concentration, document legal acquisition for any CITES-listed species, and test identity on receipt. These are plans; no suppliers have been qualified.
A route comparison starts with the functional unit and ends with supply risk
Ask how such a comparison would be scoped for an ingredient.